I don't think there is anyone on the planet that hasn't heard of Bigfoot, or one of the derivatives of Bigfoot, like Yeti, Sasquatch, Grassman, etc. We know the creature to be some sort of bipedal primate or humanoid type creature covered in hair from head to toe. It has a stench that could peal the paint off walls. It is said to be extremely strong and very intelligent for an animal. Yes, I called it an animal. I realize that there is a group of you out there that considers Bigfoot to be some kind of interdimensional traveling being that is highly intelligent. Personally, I don't believe that.
Believing that Bigfoot is nothing more than a primate of sorts, there should be a way to prove its existence. We have photographs, video, footprints, handprints of this creature, yet there are many that don't believe it to be a real animal. Others ask, why have we never found any remains of a Bigfoot - bones, teeth, hair, etc. There are a number of hypothesises concerning this. One of the TV shows, I can't remember which one now, laid out a fresh roadkill carcass in the woods. Tied the carcass down so no scavenger could make off with it. They setup a time delayed camera that took pictures as it decomposed. It was just a matter of days before the only thing left was bones and teeth. Nature has a way of disposing of its dead. Could this be used to explain why we have never found a carcass? Its a possibility, but I still think we would find some sort of remains. Second thought is that Bigfoot buries its own. That is has an area that it puts the dead, or even a place that Bigfoot goes when it knows its dying, similar to an 'elephant graveyard'.
In my opinion, the only way to prove Bigfoot exists is to kill one and bring the carcass out for all to see. That will be the only true way to prove the existence of this animal. You can't call it a myth or legend if it is in front of you in the flesh,can you? Now, I realize that this will stir up debate and attitudes about killing another creature. Others still argue with me that pictures of the creature will be enough to prove its existence or not. Which I rebut by saying, look at the Patterson Film. It has been torn apart and still experts agree that it is a real creature, the muscle definition in its legs, its breasts, the way the head turns, etc.
Let me set something clear. I am not saying to run out in the woods, guns blazing to kill an animal. I am saying, whats to stop a controlled 'hunt' with scientists and Bigfoot 'experts' to recover a specimen. I'd support the effort to the best of my abilities.
Now, PETA will probably jump all over me for even bringing up killing an animal in the name of science, but what other way to we have that will prove its existence beyond all doubt?
Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
TrackBack URI for this entry
Subscribe to this comment's feed
| Next > |
|---|